Criteria 2

Metric No. 2.1 Download
2.1.1.a. GOI SC ST OBC Quota View Documents
2.1.1.c. UG PG student list of RGUHS(5 years) View Documents
2.1.1.d. Seat matrix of 5 years View Documents
2.1.2.a. UG and PG student list of college(5-years) View Documents
2.1.2.b. PhD Guide student list admission proof documents View Documents
2.1.2.c. Certificate course list applications(5-years) View Documents
2.1.3.a. Non Karnataka UG PG student list of RGUHS(5 years) View Documents
2.1.3.b. UG admit cards eligibility certificates(5 years) View Documents
2.1.3.c. PG students admit cards(5 years) View Documents
2.1.3.d. PG student degree certificates of 5 years View Documents
2.1.3.e. UG student 10th marks cards(5 years) View Documents
Metric No. 2.2 Download
2.2.1 Sample of PG assessment and evaluation View Documents
2.2.1 Student achievements View Documents
2.2.1 Remedial teaching Support View Documents
2.2.1.b Low performers high achievers documents(5-years) View Documents
2.2.3.a College and Prajwala(RSST) magazine(5-years) View Documents
2.2.3.b GC- Details from(2015-2019) View Documents
2.3.4.b Mentor Mentee interaction documentation of preceeding year 2018-19(UG-students) View Documents
2.3.5.1 College andPrajwala(RSST)magazine(5-years) View Documents

Key Indicator- 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity (25)

Metric No. 2.2.3 Institution facilitates building and sustenance of innate talent /aptitude of individual students (extramural activities/beyond the classroom activities such as student clubs, cultural societies, etc) Download
2.2.3.a. College and Prajwala(RSST) magazine(5 years) View Documents
2.2.3.b. GC Details from(2015 2019) View Documents
2.2.3. Beyond the classroom activities View Documents
2.2.3. Beyond the classroom activity extramural activites View Documents
2.2.3 Student Movies View Documents
2.2.3. Camp video link View Documents

Key Indicator 2.3. Teaching Learning Process (45)

Metric No. 2.3.1 Student centric methods are used for enhancing learning experiences by: Download
2.3.1 learning environment facility with geotag View Documents
Metric No. 2.3.2 Institution facilitates the use of Clinical Skills Laboratory / Simulation Based Learning
The Institution:
Download
2.3.2. CDEs from 2015 till date View Documents
2.3.2. Clinical skill labs View Documents
2.3.2. GEOTAGGED PHOTOGRAPHS OF PRECLINICAL LABORATORIES View Documents
2.3.2. RVDC View Documents
Metric No. 2.3.3 Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching and learning process including online e resources
Download
2.3.3.1. list of fulltime teachers sanctioned posts 5 years View Documents
2.3.3.2. library details View Documents
2.3.3.3. classrooms Geotagged library View Documents
2.3.3.4. Quiklrn video link View Documents
Metric No. 2.3.5 The teaching learning process of the institution nurtures creativity, analytical skills and innovation among students
Download
2.3.5.1. College and Prajwala(RSST) magazine(5 years) View Documents
2.3.5.2. creativity and analytical skills of students View Documents
2.3.5.3. Cultural eventsand extracurricular activities View Documents
2.3.5.4. Student movies View Documents
2.3.5.5. camp video link View Documents

Key indicator_2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality

Metric No. 2.4.1. Average percentage of fulltime teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years: Download
2.4.1.1. Year wise list of fulltime teachers View Documents
2.4.1.2. Sanctioned letters View Documents
Metric No. 2.4.2. Average percentage of fulltime teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc./ D.Lit./DM/M Ch/DNB in super specialities /other PG degrees (like MD/ MS/ MDS etc.,) in Health Sciences (like MD/ MS/ MDS etc.,) for recognition as Ph.D guides as per the eligibility criteria stipulated by the Regulatory Councils/Affiliating Universities. Download
2.4.2. PhD Guide ship letters View Documents
Metric No. 2.4.3. Average Teaching experience of fulltime teachers in number of years (data for the preceding academic year) Download
2.4.3. Appointment letters of staff View Documents
Metric No. 2.4.4. Average percentage of teachers trained for development and delivery of e-content / e-courses during the last 5 years Download
2.4.4. Certificates of e courses View Documents
2.4.4. Content Delivered by faculty View Documents
Metric No. 2.4.5. Average Percentage of fulltime teachers who received awards and recognitions for excellence in teaching, student mentoring, scholarships, professional achievements and academic leadership at State, National, International levels from Government / Government-recognized agencies / registered professional associations / academies during the last five years Download
2.4.5. E copies of award letters View Documents

Key indicator_2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms

Metric No. 2.5.1. The Institution adheres to the academic calendar for the conduct of Continuous Internal Evaluation and ensures that it is robust and transparent Download
2.5.1.1 Academic calendar View Documents
2.5.1.2. Dates of conduct of internal assessment examinations View Documents
Metric No. 2.5.2. Mechanism to deal with examination-related grievances is transparent, time-bound and efficient Download
2.5.2.1. Details of University examinations View Documents
2.5.2.2. Grievances regarding University examinations View Documents
Metric No. 2.5.2. Mechanism to deal with examination-related grievances is transparent, time-bound and efficient Download
2.5.2.1. Details of University examinations View Documents
2.5.2.2. Grievances regarding University examinations View Documents
Metric No. 2.5.3. Reforms in the process and procedure in the conduct of evaluation/examination; including the automation of the examination system Download
2.5.3. Information on examination reforms View Documents
Metric No. 2.5.4. The Institution provides opportunities to students for midcourse improvement of performance through specific interventions Download
2.5.4.1. opportunities for midcourse improvement View Documents
2.5.4.2. Policy document of midcourse improvement View Documents
2.5.4.3. Retest sheets View Documents
2.5.4.4. Remedial teaching View Documents
2.5.4.5. Make up assignments View Documents
2.5.4.6. Answer sheets View Documents
2.5.4.7. Ontime assessment and feedback View Documents

Key indicator_2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome

Metric No. 2..6.1. The Institution has stated the learning outcomes (generic and programme-specific) and graduate attributes as per the provisions of the Regulatory bodies and the University; which are communicated to the students and teachers through the website and other documents Download
2.6.1.1. learning outcomes and graduate attributes View Documents
2.6.1.2. Methods of the assessment of learning outcomes View Documents
2.6.1.3.  Programme course specific outcomes for all courses View Documents
Metric No. 2.6.2. Incremental performance in Pass percentage of final year students in the last five years Download
2.6.2.1. annual report of examination results View Documents
2.6.2.2. Incremental performance and result analysis View Documents
Metric No. 2.6.3. The teaching learning and assessment processes of the Institution are aligned with the stated learning outcomes. Download
2.6.3.  Programme course specific outcomes for all courses View Documents
Metric No. 2.6.4. Presence and periodicity of parent-teachers meetings, remedial measures undertaken and outcome analysis Download
2.6.4.1. Proceedings of parent–teachers meetings View Documents
2.6.4.2. Outcome analysis of parent teachers meetings View Documents
2.6.4.3. Action taken following parent teachers meetings View Documents